Watch the demo
From a stack of statement PDFs, across several custodians and mixed currencies, to a verified proposal in the reporting currency you choose. The whole workflow, in about a minute.
The recording has no narration. Read the transcript for a written description of each step.
The problem
The statement pile is where prospects go cold
- Hours of re-keying per prospect before any analysis starts
- Momentum dies in the “I’ll get back to you next week” follow-up
- Consumer AI tools are off the table under your compliance policy
Step 1
Upload the statements
- Drag the PDFs in, across several custodians and mixed currencies
- Review the list, then analyze with one click
- Multiple statements combine into one household view
Step 2
Verified extraction
- Every position extracted
- Reconciled against the statement’s own printed totals
- Low-confidence rows flagged for review, never silently guessed
Review
A review queue you can audit
- Clear verdict: passed / needs review / failed
- Every flag traceable to the exact row it came from
Mixed currencies
Several currencies, one household
- A EUR statement verifies against its own EUR totals, never a converted number
- You choose the reporting currency; nothing is converted silently
- The period-end FX rate, source, and date are disclosed on every row and export
Step 3
Analysis in minutes
- Allocation at a glance
- Fund-fee drag in dollars per year
- Concentration risk, embedded gains, and transition-tax estimates
Optional appendix
Returns vs. benchmarks, hypothetical
- US large-cap · global stocks · US bonds · classic 60/40
- A hypothetical backtest, so it stays switched off unless you choose to include it
- Methodology, coverage and the required disclosures print alongside it
Step 4
The proposal
- Client-ready PDF with your firm's name, vs. your model portfolio
- Fee savings and transition-tax considerations
- Basis for recommendation and disclosures built in
Your workflow
Everything exports
- Excel workbook: holdings, allocation, validation, returns
Compliance
Data handling and review
- Hosted on AWS in the EU (Frankfurt); more regions on the roadmap
- Your data trains nothing · deletion on your schedule
- The adviser reviews everything before a client sees it
The sample statement is fully synthetic: a fictional custodian and fictional data, not a real client statement.
Design partner already? Log in to run TieoutIQ on your own statements.
Demo transcript
The recording is silent, so this describes what is on screen. The statements in it are synthetic.
- 0:00The workspace login page. Credentials are typed in and submitted.
- 0:08The upload screen, with two statements staged for a single household: one from a US trust company in dollars, one from a European brokerage in euros. A household name is typed in, and the pair is submitted together.
- 0:17Per-file progress. Each statement is extracted and checked against its own printed totals, in its own currency, and a verdict badge lands next to each one as it finishes.
- 0:25Because the two statements are in different currencies, a card asks which currency to report in before anything is combined. US dollars is chosen.
- 0:30The combined household view, with a disclosure line under the banner showing the euro to dollar conversion: the period-end rate, its source, and its date.
- 0:34One row did not reconcile: the statement's text layer dropped a decimal point in a quantity. The row is corrected in place and attested, verification runs again, and the banner updates. The correction is written to the audit log.
- 0:47The euro account's positions shown in dollars, each row keeping its original amount and the rate used alongside the converted figure.
- 0:53The analysis: portfolio value, account and position counts, fund expenses per year and unrealized gains as stat tiles, then allocation by asset type and the largest positions, with concentration flags on the two biggest holdings.
- 0:59The proposal card, and the download for a client-ready proposal PDF alongside the one-page summary and the Excel workbook.
More detail on the reconciliation step is on how the tie-out works, and the honest scope of the product is on what TieoutIQ does not do.